NSF and “Senatorial Peer Review”: one blogger’s paranoid response.

Please notice that the title of this post promises a “paranoid response”, not a careful analysis. It’s one of those unscheduled features of this blog. Kind of like a snow day.
Yesterday’s Inside Higher Ed has an article about the U.S. Senate getting kind of testy with the director of the NSF about certain research projects the NSF has seen fit to fund. Regular readers know that I think we can have a reasoned debate about funding priorities (especially when that funding is put up by the public). It does not sound to me like the exchange in the Senate was that kind of reasoned debate.

Continue reading

Getting ideas from Donald Trump? (An oldie from the vault.)

Hey, it’s May already! Could that explain why things are crazy-busy here?
There will be new content soon, once I’ve plowed through some more grading and exam-writing and curricular trouble-shooting. In the meantime, since I copped to enjoying reality TV more than I should (in that ABC meme, under “Not going to cop to”), I thought I’d share a May post from the earlier incarnation of this blog, a post in which I muse on what “The Apprentice” (a show, as of this season, I no longer watch … we’ve grown apart) might teach us about how to improve the scientific community.
Yes, it’s utterly daft. So what are you waiting for?

Continue reading

The obligatory poem from Emily Dickinson.

Although certain bloggers of my acquaintance are suspicious of Emily Dickinson, I think she’s the bee’s knees. It wouldn’t be National Poetry Month without a selection from Emily.
In case you’re hesitating about clicking “Read on”, I will entertain, in the comments, a discussion of whether the position Miss Dickinson advocates in the poem is an ethical one. And, a bonus fun fact: nearly every Emily Dickinson poem can be sung to the tune of “The Yellow Rose of Texas”.

Continue reading

101 Movies meme.

I saw it at Julie’s. Below the fold is a list of 101 movies that the movie-intelligensia think you should have seen in order to have an intelligent discussion about film.
I have bolded the movies I have seen. As well (though I’m adding this part), I’m italicizing movies I have officially “seen” but know that I fell asleep in the middle of seeing them. (Most of these are post-sprog rentals.) And (one last modification), I’m putting an asterisk next to the ones that arguably have something like scientific content (even if peripheral).
Feel free to tell me, in the comments, which of the ones I haven’t seen I ought to move to the top of the viewing list.

Continue reading